Dividend Two Directory 09
Page 10

The best Dividend Two days are more productive.

Dividend Two

Dividend Two Home

Dividend Two Sitemap

Dividend Two Dir 01

Dividend Two Dir 02

Dividend Two Dir 03

Dividend Two Dir 04

Dividend Two Dir 05

Dividend Two Dir 06

Dividend Two Dir 07

Dividend Two Dir 08

Dividend Two Dir 09

Dividend Two Dir 10

Dividend Two Dir 11

Dividend Two Dir 12

Dividend Two Dir 13

Dividend Two Dir 14

Dividend Two Dir 15

Dividend Two Dir 16

Dividend Two Dir 17

Dividend Two Dir 18

Dividend Two Dir 19

Dividend Two Dir 20

Dividend Two Directory 09
Page 10

It is, of course, quite true that no writer is bound by traditions of art, and there is no one who need consider how the thing has been done before, or follow a prescribed code. But for all that, art is not a thing of rules made and enforced by critics. All that critics can do is to determine what the laws of art are; because art has laws underlying it which are as certain as the laws of gravity, even if they are not known. The more permanent art is, the more it conforms to these laws; because the fact is that there is a vital impulse in the human mind towards the expression of beauty, and a vital discrimination too as to the form and method of that expression. Architecture, for instance, and music, are alike based upon instinctive preferences in human beings, the one for geometrical form, the other for the combination of vibrations. It is a law of music, for instance, that the human being prefers an octave in absolute unison, and not an octave of which one note is a semitone flat. That is not a rule invented by critics; it is a law of human perception and preference. Similarly there is undoubtedly a law which determines human preferences in poetry, though a far more complicated law, and not yet analysed. The new poet is not a man who breaks the law, but one who discovers a real extension of it.

The law by which the Judices were to be taken only from the Equites, and not from the Senators, as had been the custom hitherto. This was a very important enactment, and needs a little explanation. All offenses against the state were originally tried in the Popular Assembly; but when special enactments were passed for the trial of particular offenses, the practice was introduced of forming a body of Judices for the trial of these offenses. This was first done upon the passing of the Calpurnian Law (B.C., 149) for the punishment of provincial magistrates for extortion in their government (_De Repetendis_). Such offenses had to be tried before the Praetor and a jury of Senators; but as these very Senators either had been or hoped to be provincial magistrates, they were not disposed to visit with severity offenses of which they themselves either had been or were likely to be guilty. By depriving the Senators of this judicial power, and by transferring it to the Equites, Gracchus also made the latter a political order in the state apart from their military character. The name of Equites was now applied to all persons who were qualified by their fortune to act as Judices, whether they served in the army or not. From this time is dated the creation of an _Ordo Equestris_, whose interests were frequently opposed to those of the Senate, and who therefore served as a check upon the latter.

And it should be noted that this international co-operation is not by any means always with similar and racially allied nations. Republican France finds itself, and has been for a generation, the ally of autocratic Russia. Australia, that much more than any other country has been obsessed by the yellow peril and the danger from Japan, finds herself today fighting side by side with the Japanese. And as to the ineradicable hostility of races preventing international co-operation, there are fighting together on the soil of France as I write, Flemish, Walloons, and negroes from Senegal, Turcos from Northern Africa, Gurkhas from India, co-operating with the advance on the other frontier of Cossacks, and Russians of all descriptions. This military and political co-operation has brought together Mohammedan and Christian; Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox; negro, white and yellow; African, Indian, and European; monarchist, republican, Socialist, reactionary--there seems hardly a racial, religious, or political difference that has stood in the way of rapid and effective co-operation in the common need.


[ Sec 09 Part 01 ] [ Sec 09 Part 02 ] [ Sec 09 Part 03 ] [ Sec 09 Part 04 ] [ Sec 09 Part 05 ]
[ Sec 09 Part 06 ] [ Sec 09 Part 07 ] [ Sec 09 Part 08 ] [ Sec 09 Part 09 ] [ Sec 09 Part 10 ]


This page is Copyright © Dividend Two and all rights are reserved. Please don't copy without proper authorization. References to other Web sites are not endorsements. Dividend Two entails no providences or assurances about the quality or content of other sites that Dividend Two is gracious enough to provide any links for. Links from Dividend Two are a privilege, not a right, but Dividend Two cannout vouch for other Web sites.